Housing
Abaixo-Assinado - Convocação de Assembleia Geral Extraordinária
Signatures 1

3
Verified signatures
Your signature is not just a number, it is verifiable proof of your intent, legally backed.
United StatesElectronic signature law (ESIGN / UETA)
Every signature produces a PDF certificate with the date, the name you gave and the SHA-256 fingerprint of the exact text you signed. If you sign anonymously your name stays off the page; the certificate exists all the same.
That PDF is sealed with the electronic certificate of CAUSFY GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES S.L., issued by the Spanish Royal Mint (FNMT). Any PDF reader can check who issued it and that nobody has altered it.
Its fingerprint is also recorded in a public blockchain, which stands as witness: from that moment a signature cannot be changed, nor a back-dated one slipped in, without the record failing to add up.
It is a simple electronic signature and it works as evidence: no law may reject it merely for being electronic. It is not an advanced or a qualified signature, which a citizens’ petition does not require either.
In United States it is recognised by ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. § 7001) + UETA.
General information, not legal advice.
We process your personal data in accordance with our Privacy policy and our Terms of use.
Published: Sep 24, 2026Active until: Jan 22, 2027
Public Act 25-49, known as HB-5002, is a sweeping housing bill now awaiting the Governor's signature. We agree that Connecticut faces real housing challenges. But this bill replaces local planning with a single statewide formula, and small towns and cities would bear most of the cost.
The act asks the state to assign each municipality a fair share of affordable housing, using a method that does not account for limits such as water and wastewater capacity. Towns would then have to adopt policies to meet that number, draft an additional priority housing plan and seek state approval at every step. For small local governments with few staff, this is a heavy new layer of paperwork.
Other provisions go further. The bill bans minimum off-street parking requirements for developments of up to 24 units, weakening towns' ability to manage traffic and safety. It lets commercial lots be converted to two to nine unit housing as of right, even where towns are working to attract new businesses. And it exposes local planning commissions to attorney's fees when they appeal under the Affordable Housing Appeals Act, known as 8-30g.
Most worrying is the link to money. Eligibility for infrastructure grants would be prioritized by zoning compliance, so towns that cannot meet the mandate would drop to the bottom of the list for funds that pay for roads, water quality and wastewater.
We ask the Governor to veto the bill and bring towns to the table for a housing plan that respects local character and local budgets.
Addressed to
We ask the Governor of Connecticut to use his veto power and reject Public Act 25-49 (HB-5002), so that the state and its municipalities can work together on housing solutions that fit the needs of each town.
3 of 250 signatures
We don’t trade your data: no ads, no trackers. Your contribution helps us keep it that way.
This cause exists because someone decided not to leave things as they were. Is there something you would change? Start yours today.
Start my cause